Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
walbourn: (Default)
[personal profile] walbourn
I was originally worried about this film. From the few scenes on the Daily Show as part of an interview, I was worried it dealt with psychological torture like Saw or something, which I'm not remotely interested in seeing. It didn't, and overall I quite enjoyed it. Think 1984 dystopia meets The Counte of Monte Cristo.

A lot of film critics seem to see this film as "anti-Bush", which is interesting because there is only a passing reference to anything in modern American politics which is basically just a link to the Iraq war in the 'future history' back-story. If anything, people's connection of constant fear-mongering, security in exchange for privacy, and demonization of the different in the film to Bush is more a reflection of his administration than anything to do with the film itself. The timing is pure marketing strategy. I'm sure right-wingers are going to continue with their 'blame the messenger' attacks, as this film's pro-individual, pro-gay and human rights, pro-democracy subtext is the stuff 'secular intellectual liberal elitism' is made of.

As a note, the films' contribution to the Cult of Natalie Portman expands her appeal to schoolgirl fetishists and lesbian chicks who dig butch girls.

Profile

walbourn: (Default)
walbourn

March 2024

S M T W T F S
     1 2
3456789
10111213141516
171819202122 23
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jan. 17th, 2026 05:57 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios