Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
walbourn: (Default)
[personal profile] walbourn
I was originally worried about this film. From the few scenes on the Daily Show as part of an interview, I was worried it dealt with psychological torture like Saw or something, which I'm not remotely interested in seeing. It didn't, and overall I quite enjoyed it. Think 1984 dystopia meets The Counte of Monte Cristo.

A lot of film critics seem to see this film as "anti-Bush", which is interesting because there is only a passing reference to anything in modern American politics which is basically just a link to the Iraq war in the 'future history' back-story. If anything, people's connection of constant fear-mongering, security in exchange for privacy, and demonization of the different in the film to Bush is more a reflection of his administration than anything to do with the film itself. The timing is pure marketing strategy. I'm sure right-wingers are going to continue with their 'blame the messenger' attacks, as this film's pro-individual, pro-gay and human rights, pro-democracy subtext is the stuff 'secular intellectual liberal elitism' is made of.

As a note, the films' contribution to the Cult of Natalie Portman expands her appeal to schoolgirl fetishists and lesbian chicks who dig butch girls.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

walbourn: (Default)
walbourn

March 2024

S M T W T F S
     1 2
3456789
10111213141516
171819202122 23
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jan. 17th, 2026 07:27 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios