Newspeak is alive!
Jan. 30th, 2004 11:28 amGeorgia considers banning 'evolution'
Couldn't we just ban conservative non-scientific Georgians instead?
As messy as our public education system is in this nation, these nutballs do in fact have unopposed control of a lot of the private educational institutions. I suppose we should just let the creationist have their way and not teach their children anything about evolution or biology or science, and let the Darwinian principle leave them (and the rest of the nation) in rural ignorance while the Indians, Japanese, and other countries actually have highly educated scientists instead of willfully ignorant pseudo-scientists.
Ass hats.
For the record, I'm all for teaching religious doctrine as part of a well-rounded education, but I mean a balanced comparative world-wide religion course covering more than "what flavor of Baptist or Presbyterian are you?". Keep any (even veiled) reference to the Bible the hell out of the science courses and put issues of faith within their proper context, which is nowhere to be found in a Petri dish without a lot more discussion and background.
Evolution is not an unproved theory, it is a fact just as much as Newton's laws of classical physics or Einstein's theory of relativity is a fact supported by an immense amount of experiment, documentation, research, independent verification, and does not require (or exclude) any 'magic goes here' appeals. It should be called the "Law of Evolution" not the "Theory of Evolution".
Creationism is a religious world-view, not a scientific principle, which seems predicated on the idea that the physical evidence was designed specifically to lie to us. The concept that any evidence you find can be discounted as 'the work of Satan' violates the entire point of the Scientific Method.
Stupid ass hats.
Couldn't we just ban conservative non-scientific Georgians instead?
As messy as our public education system is in this nation, these nutballs do in fact have unopposed control of a lot of the private educational institutions. I suppose we should just let the creationist have their way and not teach their children anything about evolution or biology or science, and let the Darwinian principle leave them (and the rest of the nation) in rural ignorance while the Indians, Japanese, and other countries actually have highly educated scientists instead of willfully ignorant pseudo-scientists.
Ass hats.
For the record, I'm all for teaching religious doctrine as part of a well-rounded education, but I mean a balanced comparative world-wide religion course covering more than "what flavor of Baptist or Presbyterian are you?". Keep any (even veiled) reference to the Bible the hell out of the science courses and put issues of faith within their proper context, which is nowhere to be found in a Petri dish without a lot more discussion and background.

Creationism is a religious world-view, not a scientific principle, which seems predicated on the idea that the physical evidence was designed specifically to lie to us. The concept that any evidence you find can be discounted as 'the work of Satan' violates the entire point of the Scientific Method.
Stupid ass hats.